Heute keine Projektion: Penetration/​João César Monteiro

some fur­ther thoughts on pene­tra­ti­on: pene­tra­ti­on as loo­sing innocence

a ques­ti­on I asked Albert Ser­ra two years ago:

Let’s con­ti­nue with ano­ther fee­ling: In your film I felt a strong desi­re for the women, their inno­cence and the way you show them. But at the same time I also had the desi­re to die.

I am cold and I am pas­sio­na­te. May­be it is the mix of tho­se to attri­bu­tes you feel the­re. I am dan­ge­rous. I have a lot of deter­mi­na­ti­on but wit­hout a goal. The same is true for the cha­rac­ters in the film. They desi­re but they don’t have a true object of desi­re. The­re is no pro­per goal in my film. It is just a dead desi­re. The­re are no con­cre­te fee­lings for me. Though it may be sen­su­al and some­ti­mes ero­tic the cha­rac­ters can­not feel true desi­re wit­hout objects. And as you men­tio­ned the women in the film, I like them, too. Espe­ci­al­ly one of them, she has a very pro­vo­ca­ti­ve face. And that is exact­ly why I don’t use her face in my film. I think of film­ma­kers as spec­ta­tors. Let me explain that. I see the girl and I like her. But I don’t want to inter­fe­re, I don’t want to touch her or give her any mea­ning. I feel very clo­se to Andy War­hol in this aspect. He tal­ked a lot about mani­pu­la­ting wit­hout tou­ch­ing. Of cour­se, I mani­pu­la­te. I shoot, I edit, I chan­ge things until long after the shoo­ting. But I won’t touch mate­ria­li­ty. It is almost a catho­lic thought. The idea of sacred mate­ria­li­ty, it is a kind of spi­ri­tu­al meta­mor­pho­sis for me. At the same time I feel it to be more respectful. What ulti­m­ate­ly arri­ves is a stran­ge mix­tu­re of natu­ra­lism and artificiality.

-

how to achie­ve inno­cence? how to film inno­cence? the moment you cap­tu­re it on film, it is not inno­cent anymore…

-

«Wret­ches! ye loved her for her wealth and hated her for her pride, 

And when she fell in feeb­le health, ye bles­sed her- that she died! 

How shall the ritu­al, then, be read?- the requi­em how be sung 

By you- by yours, the evil eye,- by yours, the slan­de­rous tongue 

That did to death the inno­cence that died, and died so young?»

(Len­ore-Edgar Allan Poe)

-

pene­tra­ti­on as death of innocence

-

but then the­re is João César Mon­tei­ro (film­ing an inno­cent death of inno­cence; trembling in beauty)

Give me arms and hor­ses, wars will be mine

Silvestre

Silvestre2

You have long tres­ses sis­ter, you will be known.

- With sharp scis­sors they will be cut short.

Silvestre3

You have a shy look sis­ter, you will be known.

- When I am with men, I will not look down.

Silvestre4

You have a pale face sis­ter, you will be known.

- With three days on the road, the sun will dar­ken it.

Silvestre5

You have erect should­ers sis­ter, you will be known.

- May my wea­pons be hea­vy for my should­ers to fall.

Silvestre6

You have a high bosom sis­ter, you will be known.

- I will shrink my bosom into my heart within.

Silvestre7You have gent­le hands sis­ter, you will be known.

- The­re will be wind and rain that will toug­hen them.

Silvestre8

You have broad hips sis­ter, you will be known.

- They will be under my dou­blet, men will never see them.

Silvestre9

You have dain­ty feet sis­ter, you will be known.

- I will put them in boots and they will never be shown.

Silvestre10

You will be afraid in batt­le sis­ter, you will be known.

- I will know how to be a man with my lan­ce in my hand.

Silvestre14

You will fall in love sis­ter, you will be known.

- Tho­se who speak to me of love will pay dear­ly for it.

Silvestre15