There’s a but­ter­fly win­ging into the image in Vitto­rio De Sica’s La cio­cia­ra as Jean-Paul Bel­mon­do and Sophia Loren are hiding behind the stone wall of a bridge. A Ger­man side­car is racing towards them on the road, but they prompt­ly fade into the shadow of the bar­ri­er. The but­ter­fly doesn’t take the risk, it quick­ly chan­ges direc­tion and drifts away befo­re the car appears. The but­ter­fly does­n’t share the image with the mili­ta­ry vehic­le. A ten­der, heart-warm­ing coin­ci­dence, coming and going with the wind, a coin­ci­dence that can only hap­pen in cine­ma. Later, Bel­mon­do and Loren get lucky again and sur­vi­ve a bom­bing; this time, the came­ra inten­tio­nal­ly cat­ches a lady­bug clim­bing through the grass. The tran­quil­li­ty of insects only draws our atten­ti­on for brief seconds: the film is loud, robust and hope­l­ess, depic­ting the last years of World War II in Ita­ly through the sto­ry of a wido­wed mother, Cesi­ra – play­ed by the high-spi­ri­ted and con­stant­ly gri­macing Loren – and her daugh­ter, Roset­ta, who try to find shel­ter in Cesira’s nati­ve vil­la­ge after the bom­bing of Rome.

The­re, they meet Miche­le, a young man cha­rac­te­ri­zed by his bur­ning faith in lite­ra­tu­re and the peas­an­try, his rever­ence for sin­ce­ri­ty and the Bible and his unre­len­ting cri­ti­cism of both his own com­mu­ni­ty and the world he would never see. His digni­ty and moral con­cerns are not taken serious­ly by his envi­ron­ment, which regards his youthful tem­pe­ra­ment with impa­ti­ence. His eye­sight is so weak that when he acci­den­tal­ly sees Roset­ta naked, Cesi­ra com­forts her daugh­ter by say­ing that Miche­le can bare­ly see any­way. He is play­ed by Bel­mon­do, who hadn’t inte­rio­ri­zed his per­so­na yet and was able to nuan­ce Michele’s explo­si­ve, inse­cu­re and pro­fu­se­ly kind move­ments and ges­tu­res. He stands with his back to Cesi­ra, whom he secret­ly ado­res and looks far away while con­tem­pla­ting his past voca­ti­on of beco­ming a priest. May­be it was inde­ed my voca­ti­on and that’s why I shouldn’t do it, Michel­le adds. He is anxious­ly crum­pling Rosetta’s histo­ry book that he took from her to make a speech about the igno­rance of schools. When Cesi­ra asks him about girls, he gets uncom­for­ta­ble and pain­ful­ly gig­gles. Two fascists turn up, they tell Miche­le about the arrest of Mus­so­li­ni and threa­ten to kill him. He only smi­les at them, stan­ding in a tru­ly priest-like pos­tu­re. If it’s true, I can die hap­py. When a group of Ger­man sol­diers take him to show them the qui­ckest way through the moun­ta­ins he also smi­les. Ever­yo­ne around him seems to under­stand what will follow.

Miche­le is neither a holy fool, nor a con­se­quent ideo­lo­gist. In his hasty argu­ments, overt gene­ro­si­ty, his pru­dent rea­ding from the Bible, his clum­sy roman­tic attempts and fara­way moments of sta­ring at flowers and lady­bugs, Miche­le incor­po­ra­tes that tran­si­tio­nal sta­te bet­ween a child and an adult, bet­ween self-impo­sed austeri­ty and the desi­re to live. He doesn’t know when to chan­ge direc­tions as rou­ti­ne­ly as the but­ter­fly, but they’re simi­lar in their delicacy.

Jean-Paul Bel­mon­do beca­me a litt­le too cool, viri­le and mus­cu­lar for Miche­le over the deca­des. Yet, with dif­fe­rent moti­va­tions and in dif­fe­rent clo­thes, he kept loo­king for the truth in idio­syn­cra­tic ways; he was even a priest once. The inno­cent smi­le had also alte­red over time but he con­tin­ued to pre­ser­ve his pri­de when­ever he would walk towards death again.