Über uns

„Eine ganze Welt öffnet sich diesem Erstaunen, dieser Bewunderung, Erkenntnis, Liebe und wird vom Blick aufgesogen.“ (Jean Epstein)

Glimpses at DANCING

PATRICK HOLZAPFEL: Only the slow ones oder zumin­dest so wie Gré­go­i­re Colin in US Go Home, das heißt so, dass man sich allein und frei wähnt (sich selbst vergessen). 

Agnès Godard ist die bes­te Kame­ra­frau, wenn es ums Tan­zen geht, ich weiß es. Ich glau­be, dass sie ver­stan­den hat, dass man Tan­zen­de so fil­men muss, als wäre man an zwei Orten zugleich. Die eine Hälf­te ist in einem Schlaf­zim­mer, alles ist in Zärt­lich­keits­far­ben getüncht, man sieht durch die Haut und wie sich Fin­ger umschlin­gen. Die ande­re Hälf­te ist in einem Raub­tier­kä­fig, auf Zehen­spit­zen und dar­um wis­send, dass jeder Schritt, ach jeder Mucks ins Ver­der­ben füh­ren kann. Wenn Godard im Schlaf­zim­mer ist, tanzt sie mit. Wenn sie im Käfig filmt, ver­harrt sie am Rand der Tanz­flä­che, so wie jene, die sich nicht ganz trau­en, aber die trotz­dem jeden Abend daste­hen und war­ten, dass was pas­siert oder sie wer anspricht. 

Ich stel­le mir gern vor, dass die, die ins Kino gehen, eigent­lich nur kom­men, weil sie hof­fen, dass sie ange­spro­chen wer­den. Sie schau­en auf die Lein­wand und für eini­ge Minu­ten scheint die­se Vor­stel­lung zumin­dest halb­wegs plau­si­bel, ja, war­um eigent­lich nicht…aber wenn die Lich­ter ange­hen (und das ist etwas, was die Lich­ter immer tun), dann ver­pufft die­se kurz auf­kei­men­de Hoff­nung genau so wie die erschöpf­ten Kör­per nach einem Tanz plötz­lich mer­ken, dass sie atmen. Inzwi­schen gibt es eine gan­ze Apo­the­ke an Medi­ka­men­ten, die man sich auf ver­schie­dens­te Arten ein­ver­lei­ben kann und die dafür sor­gen, dass die Musik wei­ter durch den Kör­per fließt, auch wenn sie längst ver­stummt ist. Hört man die glei­chen Rhyth­men wie sie, schwingt die gan­ze Erde wie eine Schau­kel und man tanzt, wie es so abge­dro­schen heißt, durch die Nacht. Hört man den Rhyth­mus aber nicht, fragt man sich, wer da mit krum­men Rücken und ulki­gen Sprün­gen über den Asphalt torkelt. 

Ich habe fest­ge­stellt, dass man eine Tanz­sze­ne in einem Film ohne Ton betrach­ten muss, um zu sehen, ob die Men­schen wirk­lich tan­zen oder ob sie nur Bewe­gun­gen für die Kame­ra voll­füh­ren. Sie tan­zen wirk­lich, wenn sie ver­stummt auf mich wir­ken, wie die durch die Nacht Stol­pern­den auf den Stra­ßen, also die, die spü­ren, dass sich die Erde dreht. 

Trotz­dem only the slow ones, denn nur dann hilft das Tan­zen dabei, die Gefüh­le zu ver­lang­sa­men und ich will wenig so sehr, wie lang­sa­mer zu fühlen.

JAMES WATERS: Until recent­ly, I’d assu­med a level of iro­ny in Clai­re Denis’ use of Corona’s Rhythm of the Night in Beau tra­vail; an iro­ny stem­ming from my belief that the­re has to be some­thing behind a film­ma­ker as estab­lished resort­ing to such music. The impli­ca­ti­on I car­ri­ed to it was that “Rhythm of the Night” isn’t what I con­sider “real music” – at least, com­pared to Tin­der­sticks. Poi­so­ned by a sen­se of iro­ny, the clo­sest I’d got­ten to Galoup’s (Denis Lavant) final, tran­s­cen­dent dance was in my con­cep­ti­on of Coro­na as a “guil­ty plea­su­re”, a per­spec­ti­ve ine­vi­ta­b­ly eclip­sed by Denis’ film­ma­king; one depri­ved of iro­ny and yiel­ding to the per­fect club song that mir­rors Galoup’s even­tu­al, mor­tal sub­mis­si­on (aided by a lit ciga­ret­te, a gla­ring spot­light and rising tem­po of the song’s build-up). 

Deal­ing with a more recent song that has yet to be “reclai­med” in the same way, Val­eska Grisebach’s Sehn­sucht also shows – through dance – the untain­ted bliss that can be eli­ci­ted from an excerpt of Rob­bie Wil­liams’ Feel, a pie­ce of music I’d also dis­missed up until wat­ching Grisebach’s film. One can read as much as they like into the choice and the film’s gene­ral music editing, but its intent can be nai­led down to the facts that: 

a) It was popu­lar enough at the time to cir­cu­la­te the air­wa­ves (or, at least, within the 5–10- year release win­dow in which a song like “Feel” exis­ted; remai­ning a ubi­qui­tous chart- topper/​record hol­der for years wit­hout see­ming eit­her old or new). 

b) As with most public spaces, an envi­ron­ment like a small, mess hall par­ty for Ger­man fire­figh­ters would be absent from on-the-pul­se music cura­ti­on. So, the best choice of song should re-crea­te what’d alre­a­dy exist if Gri­se­bach and her crew weren’t the­re to film it.

The film’s lead, Mar­kus (Andre­as Mül­ler), seems timid at first, sway­ing timid­ly in front of the came­ra as the song’s per­cus­sive beat kicks in. He shuf­fles along in what could equal­ly be attri­bu­ted to his character’s drun­ken­ness or the first-time actor’s reti­cence at being vul­nerable in front of the came­ra. He sways accor­ding to the song’s con­ti­nu­al build-up, with two jump-cuts inter­rupt­ing his flow (yet the song flows through the­se cuts’ con­ti­nui­ty, unin­ter­rupt­ed). After the jump-cuts he seems genui­ne­ly into the song’s rhyth­ms, car­ry­ing the view­er along with him. He evol­ves as a lis­te­ner and dancer, sway­ing – with eyes clo­sed – to the ecsta­tic build-up of Wil­liams’ song. It’s an evo­lu­ti­on that mimics my own cyni­cism as a lis­te­ner: I may hesi­ta­te to lis­ten to it becau­se of pre­vious mis­gi­vings, but the song will con­ti­nue play­ing regard­less. It’s only up to the lis­te­ner to sub­mit to its sway.

IVANA MILOŠ: The­re are few things I love more than my favo­ri­te dance sce­nes in cine­ma. Not only do I watch them time and time again, I hear them, I lis­ten to them, I dance to them, tog­e­ther with them, for them, for the cha­rac­ters who­se move­ments are akin to mine, who­se ears are akin to mine, and who­se musi­cal hearts beat to the same rhythm, even if for just a few brief ins­tances. In truth, what is bet­ter than music? This is, undoub­ted­ly, a rhe­to­ri­cal ques­ti­on, and let’s not lea­ve it at that.

1, 2, 3, 4, it’s time to share and more.

Gre­go­i­re Colin and The Ani­mals get­ting down, ciga­ret­te-in-mouth, youth in body, what a dance, what a feast of feeling:

Denis Lavant and David Bowie, the epi­to­me of modern love in all its shapes and forms. Let me run like that for once in my life, I might never stop. He hard­ly does.

Denis Lavant again, now and fore­ver, in a ren­di­ti­on of Corona’s Rhythm of the Night unli­ke any­thing else known to humankind:

Melina Mer­cou­ri takes up Ta Pai­dia tou Pei­ra­ia, dancing and sin­ging in her bed­room, not to men­ti­on tho­se snap­ping fingers:

Ana Tor­rent plays a record of Por­que te vas in Cría cuer­vos. It’s music and joy on a who­le new level, and child­hood at its most moving:

Ever­yo­ne can dance beau­tiful­ly in Erman­no Olmi’s I fidanza­ti. A moti­on goes through the room and the importance of dance beco­mes vivid­ly manifest:

Don’t let it end at that. Dance, dance, dance to the music!

ANDREW CHRISTOPHER GREEN: Not long into Ange­la Schanelec’s Plät­ze in Städ­ten the main cha­rac­ter Mimi dances with her mother at a public swim­ming pool to Joni Michell’s Cali­for­nia. They’re lis­tening to it on a por­ta­ble spea­k­er at first, and we’re lis­tening to the song with them as it echo­es through the room, but then the track gets lou­der and is syn­chro­ni­zed over the ambi­ent audio. The­re is a curtain of glass win­dows behind them, and they twirl around in their swim­suits against a cold city­scape. The shot is three and a half minu­tes long, long enough for Schanelec’s stran­ge com­po­si­ti­on to take our focus from the dancers moving peri­phe­ral­ly through some pil­lars to the space they’re in and its rela­ti­on to the bar­ren trees and envi­rons bey­ond. They stand over the hosti­le out­side like one of Cas­par David Friedrich’s Rücken­fi­gu­ren, only they’re not con­tem­pla­ting their rela­ti­onship to the distance bey­ond as Friedrich’s figu­res would. They dance indif­fer­ent­ly to the foreground/​background and inside/​outside dialec­tics the framing com­po­ses, absor­bed in them­sel­ves and their movements.

I don’t know how one ought to dance to Joni Mitchell’s fol­ki­sh songs, but the way they do seems wrong, or at least exces­si­ve. The mother is more enthu­si­a­stic than Mimi is, but they’re both very pre­sent in this sce­ne, expe­ri­en­cing some­thing like joy and tog­e­ther­ness. It’s a pres­ent­ness which fores­ha­dows Mimi’s con­stant dis­pla­ce­ments bet­ween cities and sexu­al part­ners and her estran­ge­ment from her mother. Towards the end of the film she gets pregnant and runs away, pro­ba­b­ly to Paris (her loca­ti­ons aren’t always made expli­cit but just appear in the back­grounds), winds up home­l­ess, and is sit­ting in the cold out­side a bar when someone sees her and invi­tes her in to dance. A bass-hea­vy, elec­tro­nic song plays first, and she just stands the­re. The fli­cke­ring lights show ever­yo­nes bodies in dif­fe­rent posi­ti­ons as they stro­be, but Mimi doesn’t hard­ly move at all. She’s offe­red a drink, an outra­ge­ous­ly nost­al­gic song by Ben Folds Five comes on (we heard her lis­tening to this same song at home ear­lier), and she sways around like a zom­bie. Some­bo­dy pro­ba­b­ly slip­ped some­thing. Next we hear a song by Port­is­head, which its­elf sounds like a bad drug trip. Ano­ther com­po­si­ti­on; the­re aren’t sur­roun­dings any­mo­re, just a black wall behind Mimi. We see out­lines of her body in an omi­nous red with spo­ra­dic flas­hes of blues and greens. She’s not twir­ling but spi­ra­ling, some­thing like the inver­se of her mother at the begin­ning of the film when they were tog­e­ther at the swim­ming pool. She falls asleep on a chair and we don’t know what hap­pens after. I couldn’t help but think that the lights were per­fect in their sobering irre­gu­la­ri­ty, plot­ting out the spa­ti­al coor­di­na­tes of Mimi’s regres­si­on into a womb of dark­ness. It’s a cruel and iro­nic twist of fate that the ones who feel the most inten­se­ly in our world are the ones most vul­nerable to being dis­ar­ti­cu­la­ted by it. In the­se final sce­nes I thought of Fried­rich again, this time one of his moon­lit com­po­si­ti­ons, Der Mönch am Meer. They share the motif of an indi­vi­du­al sur­roun­ded by dark­ness. One stands loo­king out into the abyss, the other is being swal­lo­wed up by it.

ANNA BABOS: “It’s not the music that gets to you. It’s the mar­ching feet.“

Máté and Mari, the peasant prot­ago­nists of Fábri Zoltán’s Kör­hin­ta, are in love. Their lon­ging for each other is hin­de­red by poli­ti­cal cir­cum­s­tances and the expec­ta­ti­ons of Mari’s fami­ly. Mari has a fian­cé, Sán­dor, and her par­ents rather sup­port their mar­ria­ge, becau­se Sán­dor, like them, oppo­ses the con­cept of forced coll­ec­ti­vi­za­ti­on of land. The fami­ly and Sán­dor hope to keep their land and unite them by mar­ria­ge, in accordance with the tradition. 

Despi­te the dif­fi­cul­ties, Máté does not give up his love for Mari. His fiery and com­ba­ti­ve desi­re cul­mi­na­tes during the wed­ding of ano­ther girl from the vil­la­ge. To the asto­nish­ment of the com­mu­ni­ty, Máté asks Mari to dance. The pro­vo­ca­ti­on mani­fests phy­si­cal­ly in his vir­tuo­so and inti­mi­da­ting dancing: like the stars of the clas­si­cal Hol­ly­wood musi­cal, Máté uses move­ment to express domi­nan­ce. But it is not strict­ly cho­reo­gra­phed, nuan­ced move­ment, and Máté is not awa­re of his vir­tuo­si­ty. Folk dance is his only wea­pon in the fight for the free­dom of their love, which has the under­to­ne of fight­ing tho­se who are against the new régime and refu­se coll­ec­ti­vi­za­ti­on. When other men from the vil­la­ge ask Mari to dance, Máté sei­zes her, and, sei­zes the day. They dance until they light-hea­ded; Mari hal­lu­ci­n­a­tes in exhaustion. 

The incre­asing­ly rapid spin­ning recalls an ear­lier encoun­ter when Máté and Mari were on a rapidly spin­ning mer­ry-go-round (the title of the film) at a vil­la­ge fair. The com­bi­na­ti­on of dance and flight, set to the libe­ra­ting rhythm of Hun­ga­ri­an folk music, evo­kes a roman­tic image of the bur­ning fla­me or the free-fly­ing youth. At the same time, the sce­ne con­veys some­thing else.

La grand illu­si­on comes to mind. “It’s not the music that gets to you. It’s the mar­ching feet», says Jean Gabin as lieu­ten­ant Maréchal. 

The sounds of Máté’s and Mari’s dance steps slow­ly take the place of the joyful vio­lin play­ing, and the music almost gets dis­ori­en­ted by the hard thuds of feet in a dream­li­ke tang­le. Dance beco­mes a mili­tant ges­tu­re through Máté’s wilful­ness. He expe­ri­en­ces the fight for com­mu­nism through his fight for love.

DAVID PERRIN: „Im Pari­ser Jeu de Pau­me hängt ein Bild von Cezan­ne, vor dem ich dann zu ver­ste­hen glaub­te, wor­um es geht, nicht nur ihm, dem Maler, und nicht nur jetzt mir, einem Schriftsteller…

Schwer zu sagen, was ich da ver­stand. Damals hat­te ich vor allem das Gefühl ‚Nähe‘. Im Bedürf­nis, das Erleb­te doch wei­ter­zu­ge­ben, kommt mir jetzt, nach lan­gem ‚Beden­ken des Gesche­hen‘ (eher ein Denk­s­turm), ein Film­bild in den Sinn: Hen­ry Fon­da, wie er in John Fords The Gra­pes of Wrath mit der eige­nen Mut­ter tanzt.

In jener Sze­ne tan­zen alle Anwe­sen­den mit­ein­an­der, zur Abwehr einer lebens­ge­fähr­li­chen Bedro­hung: so ver­tei­di­gen sie, vor der Land­not Umge­trie­be­ne, das Stü­cken Erde, auf dem sie end­lich Blei­be gefun­den haben, gegen die sie umzin­geln­den Fein­de. Obwohl das Tan­zen dem­nach pure List ist (Mut­ter und Sohn, sich rund­um dre­hend, wer­fen ein­an­der, wie auch den übri­gen, schlaue wach­sa­me Bli­cke zu) ist es doch ein Tanz wie nur je einer (und wie noch kei­ner) der über­springt als ein herz­li­cher Zusam­men­halt.“ – Peter Hand­ke, Die Leh­re von Saint-Vic­toire, S. 60–61.

RONNY GÜNL: All­täg­li­chen Bewe­gun­gen gleicht sel­ten etwas Tän­ze­ri­schem ange­sichts ihre Unbe­hol­fen­heit. Rou­ti­ne­mä­ßig lässt sich das Geschirr durch die eige­nen Hän­de abspü­len, ohne dabei nur einen Gedan­ken dar­an zu ver­schwen­den. Fast scheint es so, als bestim­me das Geschirr den Vor­gang selbst. Im Film ist dem offen­bar nicht so; es ist mög­lich jede noch so erdenk­li­che Schwer­fäl­lig­keit tän­zelnd in Schwe­be auf­zu­he­ben. Der Unter­schied ist zwar ein gerin­ger, aber umso ent­schei­den­der. Nicht der Ort der Bewe­gung bezie­hungs­wei­se des­sen Gra­vi­ta­ti­on hat sich ver­än­dert, son­dern die Zeit.

Die Fil­me von Maya Deren erkun­den die­se Ver­schie­bung. In Ritu­als in Trans­fi­gu­red Time erlan­gen die tan­zen­den Bewe­gun­gen nicht jene abso­lu­ten Form, wor­in die Per­son ganz in der Cho­reo­gra­fie tran­szen­die­re. Viel­mehr beschreibt der Film – ohne Musik – nur mit sei­nen Bil­dern einen balan­cie­ren­den Zustand, der um sei­nen Schwer­punkt kreist: Für klei­ne Momen­te deu­ten sich rhyth­mi­sie­ren­de Frag­men­te an, die sogleich ver­schwin­den, als wären sie nie gesche­hen. Immer wie­der wird der Fluss der Bewe­gung unter­bro­chen und zeit­lich ver­setzt weitergeführt.

Es ist eine Tanz­flä­che in einem Lokal zu sehen. Men­schen sind will­kür­lich im Raum auf­ge­stellt. Sie ges­ti­ku­lie­ren und reden anein­an­der vor­bei. Sie tref­fen auf­ein­an­der und tren­nen sich. Weder Ori­en­tie­rung noch Sinn fängt das Bild der Kame­ra dabei ein. Wäh­rend die Prot­ago­nis­tin (Rita Chris­tia­ni) Hals über Kopf im wel­len­ar­ti­gen Trei­ben genau danach zu suchen scheint, sehen wir Anbah­nun­gen, von etwas, das begin­nen könn­te, sich jedoch unmit­tel­bar – zugleich zyklisch – in der Luft verflüchtigt.

SIMON WIENER: Often I think of expe­ri­men­tal film as a dance. I think it is no coin­ci­dence that both can give me joy like litt­le else can, may­be becau­se both are expres­si­ons of a pecu­li­ar move­ment through space, one not usual­ly explo­red in our day-to-day-life. They both estran­ge us from our usu­al move­ments, which can be seen as the most effi­ci­ent means of con­nec­ting the dots that make up a space. One leaps through space in order to reap it, ther­eby distil­ling space into move­ment. A hier­ar­chy is crea­ted: space ser­ves us, feeds our desi­res, adorns us. If our usu­al move­ment affirms the self, Dance-Film-move­ment, ins­tead, pro­po­ses an ope­ning for the aban­don­ment of the self, it pro­po­ses a spring-board for dis­sol­ving into the Other… dis-sel­ving. The joy of this dis­so­lu­ti­on is best deno­ted by the Ger­man word auf­ge­ho­ben; we are lifted, nul­li­fied by the object of our devo­ti­on, name­ly space. May­be the hier­ar­chy is inver­ted; space cracks us open, finds a means of expres­si­on through us, a reven­ge of sorts; or may­be the hier­ar­chy is pre­ser­ved but given a twist, whe­r­ein the desi­re fed by space is direc­ted towards space its­elf. An urge to move, in order to reve­al and pre­ser­ve space – a nega­ti­ve expres­si­on whe­re the self is defi­ned by its surroundings.

SEBASTIAN BOBIK: Like many other things in life that bring us joy, dancing is some­thing that always seems to have been a part of cine­ma. One of the ear­liest films to show us a dance is the beau­tiful Dan­se ser­pen­ti­ne by the Lumie­re Brot­hers. Sin­ce then dances have been ever­y­whe­re in films, and every film has at least one or two dancing sce­nes, which are espe­ci­al­ly important and tou­ch­ing. Dancing also seems to be some­thing that shows up in the oeu­vres of even the most dif­fe­rent film­ma­kers. They can be found in images as dif­fe­rent as tho­se of Agnès and Jean-Luc Godard, Donen and Don­schen, Deren and Lei­sen, Chap­lin and Tash­lin and many, many more.

When I am asked to think about a sce­ne of peo­p­le dancing in a film my mind will often go back to one of the ear­ly ins­tances of a dance being cap­tu­red on cel­lu­loid. The Dick­son Expe­ri­men­tal Sound Film was an ear­ly attempt to crea­te a film with syn­chro­ni­zed sound to accom­pa­ny the images. The attempt fai­led at its time. The film is only about 30 seconds long. We see seve­ral things in one image: On the left side we see a man play­ing the vio­lin into a device, which is sup­po­sed to have recor­ded the sound. On the right hand two men are sha­ring a small dance with each other. Are they walt­zing? As they dance one of the men can be seen visi­bly smi­ling. Ano­ther man walks into the image from the left, then the film ends.There are ver­si­ons of this film that are silent, though I have also seen some ver­si­ons with the sound of a vio­lin. It is a small film, but it sparks of joy and delight. Somehow it always tou­ch­es me, when­ever I see it.

SIMON PETRI: Dance sce­nes in cine­ma are often descri­bed as libe­ra­ting alt­hough the cha­rac­ters in moti­on in the image are alre­a­dy libe­ra­ted; they have eit­her over­co­me the cons­traints of self-con­scious­ness or never suf­fe­r­ed it to begin with, unli­ke tho­se sit­ting around them, squir­ming on the mar­gins of the frame. They go well tog­e­ther, tho­se who enjoy the atten­ti­on (or at least don’t mind it) and tho­se who attract atten­ti­on by exis­ting in the shadow of the spec­ta­cle just to per­for­ma­tively deny it.

Trees, lea­ves and flowers dance invol­un­t­a­ri­ly, wit­hout an audi­ence for the most part: algae in the unex­plo­red depth of oce­ans, minia­tu­re bran­ches of lichen in the Scan­di­na­vi­an frost, odo­rous lin­den towe­ring over enti­re coun­ties give them­sel­ves up to forces wit­hout a pre­dic­ta­ble trajectory.

For the for­t­u­na­te the wind blows a metro­no­mic rhythm to the fer­ti­le pol­lu­ti­on. More vio­lent move­ments hap­pen in and becau­se of human pre­sence: mimo­sa lea­ves clo­se and open with the disci­pli­ne of Bus­by Berkeley’s objec­ti­fied legs, grass and pine fall and whirl as dic­ta­ted by the scy­the and the jigsaw. 

The most hea­ven­ly of dance gen­res is helio­tro­pism. It’s free of cont­act and vio­lence: there’s unpar­al­le­led distance bet­ween cho­reo­grapher and dancer, yet each move­ment fol­lows a per­fect curve.