Über uns

„Eine ganze Welt öffnet sich diesem Erstaunen, dieser Bewunderung, Erkenntnis, Liebe und wird vom Blick aufgesogen.“ (Jean Epstein)

French crime thrillers and their fading blue(s)

It star­ted with jazz, yet some of the films seem to have the blues. The second part of the Aus­tri­an Film Museum’s retro­s­pec­ti­ve dedi­ca­ted to French crime cine­ma, this time 1958 to 2009, star­ted off last month with Miles Davis’ music com­po­sed for Lou­is Malle’s Ascen­seur pour l’échaf­aud fol­lo­wing Jean­ne Moreau’s “Je t’aime” whis­pe­ring face (in Truffaut’s La mariée était en noir a man rightful­ly tells her – had he been a wri­ter, he could have writ­ten an enti­re novel about her mouth).

The blues some of the films shown (mista­ken­ly) seem to have are both chro­ma­tic and idio­ma­tic – the films eit­her feel or look blue. Per­haps it star­ted with jazz becau­se their blue(s) has/​have alre­a­dy pas­sed. It seems that it is at a moment when the cha­rac­ters have star­ted to lose even their sad­ness and the chro­ma­tic blue of the films is start­ing to fade that the second part of the retro­s­pec­ti­ve gets back to the French crime thriller.

The vibrant blue of the sea and of Alain Delon’s eyes while kis­sing a woman’s hand in René Clément’s Plein Sol­eil is fol­lo­wed by the sicke­ned blue of the films of Jean-Pierre Mel­ville. (Yet Melville’s films were blue even long befo­re that. Per­haps it was ano­ther sha­de. They star­ted being blue when in that sho­cking moment of Le Silence de la mer Nico­le Sté­pha­ne rai­ses her lim­pid eyes.) Con­curr­ent­ly, even cha­rac­ters seem to have ente­red a sta­te bey­ond blue­ness and dar­ker than it. Per­haps it hap­pens only in the films of Mel­ville. But the­re are too few reasons in favor of avo­i­ding to regard Mel­ville as the gui­de mark.

setrangleur

Stron­ger than ever per­haps, this gen­re, in which peo­p­le fol­low, misun­derstand and often end up kil­ling each other, seems to be all about the unbe­ara­ble pain of human cont­act and loneli­ne­ss – that loneli­ne­ss announ­ced by the Bushi­do quo­te at the begin­ning of Le Samou­raï. The dilem­ma – loneli­ne­ss is unbe­ara­ble and cont­act might be deadly.

Of the kil­ler cha­rac­ters for which cont­act seems to be more pain­ful than loneli­ne­ss (and of the films emana­ting that fee­ling) per­haps the most mes­me­ri­zing is Paul Vecchiali’s L’Étran­gleur, who kills becau­se he can­not bear see­ing sad­ness. In the per­haps most pes­si­mi­stic way of loo­king at it, the child­hood trau­ma (in Le Bou­ch­er, a war trau­ma) is actual­ly a source of inspi­ra­ti­on. Howe­ver, faced with the gre­at sad­ness and beau­ty of the film, one should not bother to defi­ne it.

If the­re is a lon­ging the­se films prompt, it is per­haps the desi­re to get a glim­pse of tho­se cha­rac­ters› /​of tho­se moving bodies› per­cep­ti­on (in a sen­so­ri­al rather than psy­cho­lo­gi­cal way). May­be that is also the reason why Delon’s walks through the streets of Mon­gi­bel­lo in Plein Sol­eil are so fasci­na­tingly frus­t­ra­ting. They seem to pro­vi­de the moments nea­rest to a glim­pse into that unde­ci­pherable blue eyed body’s per­cep­ti­on the film offers. [Of cour­se many films mir­ror in their aes­the­tics their cha­rac­ters› per­cep­ti­on]. In a way, despi­te the ver­ba­liza­ti­on of the strangler’s urges in L’Étran­gleur, the recur­ring vague­ly trembling and sound­less noc­turnal car dri­ves (so Phil­ip­pe Gran­drieux-esque) also feel like that. Per­haps we look at Alain Delon in Plein Sol­eil like Alex “lan­gue pen­due” (Denis “The Dra­gon” Lavant) looks at Anna (Juli­et­te Bino­che) in Leos Car­ax’ (I feel the title has to be whispe­red so as not to break the film’s spell) Mau­vais Sang.

Both L’Étran­gleur and Mau­vais Sang (the blue comes back and is more vibrant than ever) emana­te a grea­ter malai­se. In Mau­vais Sang it is spo­ken of as a dise­a­se that kills young peo­p­le who make love wit­hout emo­tio­nal invol­vement. Godard’s Alpha­ville, so inten­se­ly clo­se to Mau­vais Sang, vibra­tes with simi­lar threats.

samou

The quest for cont­act often ends up in the ina­bi­li­ty to deal with it when found. This seems to be what hap­pens to also Chabrol’s but­cher, play­ed by Jean Yan­ne and the ex-con­vict play­ed by Gérard Depar­dieu in Alain Corneau’s Le Choix des armes. The but­cher puts an end to his urge to kill others by kil­ling hims­elf. Of cour­se, this sort of cha­rac­ter can not only be found in French crime thril­lers 1958–2009 it is only that here the chan­ces of the encoun­ters being dead­ly is higher.

In the dar­kest of cases, it feels as if the­se cha­rac­ters who get invol­ved in cri­mi­nal acti­vi­ty have come to the con­clu­si­on that get­ting a bul­let in your gut is the more beara­ble risk to take, the one neces­sa­ry in order to avo­id the appar­ent­ly more stre­nuous pro­cess of refu­sing. Among tho­se many sick­nes­ses (of the spi­rit) that per­spi­re from the films, the crue­lest one is per­haps Todes­sehn­sucht (death wish, in its poor trans­la­ti­on from German).

One also finds cha­rac­ters in the­se films, which seem to get invol­ved with the world of cri­mi­na­li­ty (it does­n’t mat­ter any­mo­re on which side, law­brea­k­ers and poli­ces offi­cers dwell in the same spi­ri­tu­al mise­ry) in order to escape their “habi­tants du pla­card” (inha­bi­tants of the cup­board?), as Yves Montand’s ex-cop, (ex-)lawbreaker, alco­ho­lic cha­rac­ter, Jan­sen, calls them in Melville’s quite per­fect Le Cer­cle Rouge. The­re are quite a few par­ti­cu­la­ri­ties of Jansen’s part that are repri­sed years later by Natha­lie Baye in Xavier Beau­vois’ Le petit lieu­ten­ant.

Not only cri­mi­nals and delin­quents dwell in this (spi­ri­tu­al? moral?) mise­ry. In some of the films all various sorts of poli­ce offi­cers dwell the­re with them as well. Per­haps the clea­rest exam­p­le the­reof comes with Michel Pic­co­li as Max in Clau­de Sautet’s Max et les fer­railleurs, a film in which the acti­vi­ty of the poli­ce is shown as signi­fi­cant­ly more insi­dious than the endea­vours of delin­quents. A simi­lar por­tra­y­al of the aut­ho­ri­ties is to be found in Clau­de Chabrol’s Nada, in which an unneces­s­a­ri­ly vio­lent poli­ce inter­ven­ti­on against an anar­chist lef­tist group is orde­red, just in order to pro­vi­de a reason to down­gra­de the poli­ce­man in char­ge of the operation.

Aver­si­ons to eit­her the poli­ce (the boys in –fun­ni­ly enough –blue, though they rare­ly wear it) or relics of blue bloods (as is the case in Chabrol’s La Céré­mo­nie) does seem one of the few forces able to unite cha­rac­ters and short­ly pull them out of their pas­si­ve iso­la­ti­on. In the­se films the cha­rac­ters regain a strength to revolt and to act (which for exam­p­le in the films of Mel­ville, start­ing with Le Samou­raï, it feels they have almost com­ple­te­ly lost). In Série noi­re and in Le choix des armes by Alain Cor­neau the wind of revolt blows from the ban­lieus, as years later in Mathieu Kassovitz’s La Hai­ne, as in many other films of this retrospective.

The evo­lu­ti­on is not chro­no­lo­gi­cal, and ulti­m­ate­ly all the­se are varia­ti­ons of the felling even films made in the same year per­spi­re. After all, Melville’s Un Flic (which is not part of the retro­s­pec­ti­ve) and Jac­ques Deray’s hila­rious The Out­side Man /​Un hom­me est mort did appear the same year. Per­haps the retro­s­pec­ti­ve star­ted with jazz becau­se say­ing that the films have the blues is too mis­lea­ding and simple.