Über uns

„Eine ganze Welt öffnet sich diesem Erstaunen, dieser Bewunderung, Erkenntnis, Liebe und wird vom Blick aufgesogen.“ (Jean Epstein)

Jonas Mekas with Bolex

Some Notes on the New York Diaries of Jonas Mekas, I Seem to Live, 1950–1969

Jonas Mekas with Bolex

I. SNOW

Seve­ral years ago I wat­ched Jonas Mekas’ dia­ry film Lost, Lost, Lost (1976) on 16mm at Antho­lo­gy Film Archi­ves in down­town Man­hat­tan. It was the end of Decem­ber; the city was cold and when I step­ped out of the thea­ter three hours later onto 2nd Ave­nue I remem­ber how snow flur­ried down the street, the first flakes of the year cha­sing after cars in the wind and dis­ap­pearing into the lights of night­ti­me traf­fic. This image came to mind while rea­ding the first volu­me of Mekas’ recent­ly published New York dia­ries, which I am near­ly half­way through now. Descrip­ti­ons of win­ter wea­ther abound in his ent­ries; rea­ding them I think back to Lost, Lost, Lost, which, like the book, covers his first 20 years in New York after arri­ving with his brot­her Adol­fas in 1949 as a Dis­pla­ced Per­son from post-war Euro­pe. I remem­ber the sce­nes of snow fal­ling over Cen­tral Park, the crowds of peo­p­le gathe­red tog­e­ther in beau­tiful white fields and shots of win­try Wil­liams­burg streets whe­re the brot­hers spent their first pen­ni­less years in the city. Rea­ding Mekas’ dia­ries has cau­sed the­se images from the film to resur­face; images that have not­hing to do with cine­ma, but with life its­elf as it is momen­ta­ri­ly lived in the pre­sent befo­re it is sub­su­med by the past. And what is a dia­ry – writ­ten or visu­al – among many things if not the fra­gi­le attempt to hold still the pre­sent moment by try­ing to shel­ter it within the pro­tec­ti­ve fold of a medi­um, a feat as dif­fi­cult as it is to pre­vent a snow­fla­ke from mel­ting away by cup­ping it bet­ween the palms of your hands.

“Novem­ber 26, 1959: Snow patches, and scat­te­red lea­ves, now fro­zen, stood out in the huge, peaceful vast­ness stret­ching to all sides. And as I loo­ked at this land­scape, it had such a strong per­so­na­li­ty that it was impos­si­ble not to get lost in it. It over­ca­me me, its cold, win­try puri­ty and truth. A deep peace and sere­ni­ty came from it and it was puri­fy­ing, it forced me to aban­don all pre­ten­se, all offi­ci­al­dom and just be mys­elf – just as this land­scape was its bare self…I want to shout, as I used to do in my child­hood SNOW SNOW SNOW! – be again with it, be again!»

II. CHILDSCAPE

Invo­king the tex­tures, colors and smells of the sea­sons is a way of retur­ning to the lost land­scape of his child­hood, back to Seme­niški­ai, Lithua­nia whe­re Mekas spent the first 22 years of his life befo­re fle­e­ing the Soviets with Adol­fas in 1944. They were sub­se­quent­ly cap­tu­red by the Ger­mans en rou­te to Vien­na and sent to toil away in a forced labor camp for the rema­in­der of the war near Ham­burg. And I remem­ber too now wat­ching Remi­nis­cen­ces of a Jour­ney to Lithua­nia (1972) last Janu­ary in Vien­na; all tho­se sin­gle-framed images of birch trees and birds, flowers radi­ant in the sun, and the green fields that sur­round his home come to mind as I read:

“ July 20, 1953…we two are atta­ched only to Seme­niški­ai, to our litt­le vil­la­ge, to the coun­try­si­de and the peo­p­le and the objects the­re. It has not­hing to do with nationalism…No rain, no wind, no snow­storm, no April is like that of our child­hood, in Seme­niški­ai, nowhere…Our move­ments, the way we walk. Our accents, the way we talk. Ever­y­thing is deter­mi­ned, mark­ed by the cli­ma­te, land­scape, sun in which we grew up, lived.” 

Mekas fre­quent­ly drafts brief ver­bal sket­ches of natu­re, descrip­ti­ons that are like the calm light-han­ded brush­strokes of a water­co­lor pain­ter out in the open country…

“June 16, 1961: I just want to go out, some­whe­re, and sit under a tree, and look at the blue sky, and do not­hing, and see not­hing but that blue sky, look at the eternity…”

…or that resem­ble the expan­si­ve mini­ma­lism of a hai­ku poem…

“No date, 1960: A FILM: He sits under the tree, in the park, lis­tening to the lea­ves in the wind.” 

…a string of words that evo­ke the soot­hing light­ness of a late sum­mer day, the ten­der­ness of being in the world.

III. WALKING

The dia­ry is the kind of book you want to take with you on long walks through an unfa­mi­li­ar city, to car­ry all of its 813 pages under your arm the same way Mekas lug­ged his 16mm Bolex on his end­less ram­bles through New York. Stand on a street cor­ner, open to a page at ran­dom and read:

“August 18, 1950: For hours I wan­de­red through the city. I dis­sol­ved into it, I got drunk on it, I drifted deeper and deeper into it, wit­hout any con­trol. I wal­ked from street to street. I stood in crowds, I sat in cafe­te­ri­as, in poke­ri­nos, amu­se­ment par­lors, jazz bars. I drank the rhythm of Times Squa­re, I felt I was part of it, part of the Times Squa­re night. Then I took a sub­way and rode for half an hour. I had not­hing to do. I was drin­king the night, the emp­tin­ess and the loneli­ne­ss of the city.” 

An obses­si­ve preoc­cu­pa­ti­on with the peri­pa­tetic and the per­am­bu­la­to­ry, Mekas’ itin­er­ant wri­ting and cine­ma is that of the Home­ric drift­er tra­ve­ling through a coun­try, a city, a street whe­r­ein he casts hims­elf as an exi­le at home nowhe­re, as a nobo­dy always on the move, a fate lin­ked to his sta­tus as a Dis­pla­ced Person.

“Janu­ary 11, 1950: The­re are moments and places during which I feel that I would like to always remain the­re. But no: the next moment I am gone…So I keep moving ahead, loo­king ahead for other moments. Is it my natu­re or did the war do that to me? The ques­ti­on is: was I born a Dis­pla­ced Per­son or did the war make me into one? Dis­pla­ce­ment, as a way of living and thin­king and fee­ling. Never home. Always on the move. 

“No date, 1951: Ah, this god­damn despe­ra­ti­on of a DP, that’s what it is, I said to mys­elf. I wal­ked out of the sub­way and star­ted wal­king down 50th Street, west. The street must have an end somewhere…I’ll walk until I see its end, that’s some­thing, and this is Fri­day evening and I have not­hing else to do and nobo­dy to see.” 

Wal­king beco­mes a way of pro­bing unknown ter­ri­to­ry, a pro­cess of trans­forming a stran­ge place into fami­li­ar ter­rain whe­re new per­so­nal memo­ries are inscri­bed onto the geo­gra­phy of the city:

“Note date, 1951: I was wal­king today, loo­king for work. After sit­ting five hours in the War­ren Street employ­ment agen­cy I got lost among the down­town streets. Peo­p­le, streets, shops. Stran­ge­ly, for the first time in two years of my New York life, here on the­se streets, I could per­cei­ve a touch of memo­ry, of some­thing fami­li­ar, here, on this cor­ner of Cham­bers Street and Broad­way I have spent so much time around War­ren Street that the­re is now a litt­le part of mys­elf here, too in the­se din­gy rooms, lun­che­o­net­tes, bars…This was my New York. I almost felt as if I was home. Like a cat being stroked.” 

IV. EVERYTHING IS CINEMA

His walks often lead him to the movies – the cheap play­hou­ses on 42nd Street and the dif­fe­rent film clubs around town, such as Cine­ma 16 foun­ded by Amos Vogel. Ernst Lubit­sch, Josef von Stern­berg, Orson Wel­les, Jean Renoir, Rober­to Ros­sel­li­ni, Howard Hawks – the­se are some of the names that con­ti­nuous­ly reap­pear like musi­cal refrains in the ear­ly years of the dia­ries, befo­re his turn towards the avant-gar­de and what even­tual­ly beca­me known as the New Ame­ri­can Cinema.

“August 8, 1950: …we absorb in Hawks ever­y­thing equal­ly, ever­y­thing is important here, no clo­se-ups here, no mora­li­ty of sel­ec­ted vir­tu­es or wis­dom: the mora­li­ty of Hawks’ style (approach) is open, all-embracing…That’s what Hawks’ art does. It doesn’t even look like art. It’s so simple.” 

“Decem­ber 15, 1952: Jean Renoir spo­ke at Cine­ma 16. Scree­ning of Le Règ­le du Jeu. Even after ele­ven years in Ame­ri­ca he looks 100% French, in his short grey suit, his con­ti­nuous­ly gesti­cu­la­ting arms, and his who­le body, moving and swin­ging when he speaks. He speaks free­ly and in an impro­vi­sa­tio­nal man­ner, a stream of con­scious­ness. He likes to talk, just talk, sim­ply and wit­hout fuss.”

Rea­ding the­se ent­ries makes you want to return to tho­se films you saw years ago when you were first dis­co­ve­ring cine­ma, when it wasn’t yet ele­va­ted to an art form, but was a natu­ral part of living, like the music you lis­ten­ed to as a teenager…

…The other day I re-wat­ched Le Gran­de Illu­si­on (1937) by Renoir at home. Out­side it was dark, the midd­le of Decem­ber and as the movie was ending some­whe­re near­by a church bell was striking seven o’clock …The final shot shows Jean Gabin and Mar­cel Dalio fle­e­ing Ger­ma­ny into neu­tral Switz­er­land by crossing a field of untouch­ed snow, its whiten­ess gle­a­ming forth like an appa­ri­ti­on vague­ly seen during an after­noon nap, while the two escapees appear as two small figu­res in the land­scape, their backs towards us…

Le Grande Illusion-Jean Renoir