Über uns

„Eine ganze Welt öffnet sich diesem Erstaunen, dieser Bewunderung, Erkenntnis, Liebe und wird vom Blick aufgesogen.“ (Jean Epstein)

The Limits of Representation: An Interview with Radu Jude

BALKANROUTEN
14. Novem­ber 2018 im Film­haus am Spittelberg

RADU JUDE

2018 Cele doua exe­cu­tii ale Mare­sa­lu­lui (Kurz­film)
2018 Îmi este indi­fe­rent daca în isto­rie vom intra ca barbari
2017 Tara moarta
2016 Ini­mi cicatrizate
2015 Aferim!
2014 Scurt/​4: Isto­rii de inimã neagrã (Omni­bus­film)
2014 Tre­ce si prin pere­te (Kurz­film)
2013 O umbra de nor (Kurz­film)
2012 Toata lumea din fami­lia noastra
2011 Film pen­tru prieteni
2009 Cea mai feri­ci­tã fatã din lume
2007 Dimi­nea­ta (Kurz­film)
2006 Alex­an­dra (Kurz­film)
2006 Lam­pa cu caciu­la (Kurz­film)
2002 In fami­lie (TV Serie)

Radu Jude on the set of Scar­red Hearts

Inter­view by Andrey Arnold & Patrick Holzapfel

You made quite a few short films and you still make them. Can you tell us a bit about how you tre­at the short form in com­pa­ri­son to a fea­ture film? Is the­re any dif­fe­rence bet­ween the two for you? Did you make some films as part of a film edu­ca­ti­on pro­gram or was it never like that for you?

Radu Jude: I am not making many short films now, I recent­ly made one using some archi­ve foo­ta­ge, it is cal­led The Marshal’s Two Exe­cu­ti­ons and it is just a simp­le com­pa­ri­son of images – images from the docu­men­ta­ry of the exe­cu­ti­on of war­ti­me fascist lea­der Ion Anto­nes­cu jux­ta­po­sed with the images of the same event as it was staged in a fea­ture film which glo­ri­fies the Mar­shal. One can find a lot to think about after see­ing this com­pa­ri­son, I hope. Other­wi­se, I don’t plan on making short films for the moment, not becau­se I don’t con­sider them a serious form of film­ma­king, but becau­se my sub­jects (or how I think of them) need a litt­le bit more screen time. Other­wi­se, for me, there’s no dif­fe­rence bet­ween the two forms and I con­sider a film like, let’s say, Un chien anda­lou as good as Out 1.

How was the crea­ti­ve pro­cess behind the scripts you co-wro­te with Flo­rin Lăză­res­cu dif­fe­rent from when you wro­te alo­ne – and what did you learn from him as a collaborator?

Flo­rin is not only a gifted wri­ter (and spea­king about short forms, I must say I con­sider his short sto­ries to be the best in con­tem­po­ra­ry Roma­ni­an lite­ra­tu­re), but a good fri­end as well, despi­te the fact that he lives far, far away from me. As to what I lear­ned from him, I am not sure I can put that into words, but it has to do with a spe­cial way of loo­king at things – he can noti­ce a small event and see some­thing much deeper in it. And he is a huma­nist, for sure, while I am a bit col­der than he is. For the moment I wri­te alo­ne, I need to explo­re cine­ma in direc­tions that don’t say much to him or I use other texts as a start­ing point (as was the case with Scar­red Hearts, based on M. Ble­cher, or the way it is now with a film I am pre­pa­ring, which is based on the play Tipo­gra­fic majus­cul by Gia­ni­na Cărbunariu).

Are the­re any “rules“ or prin­ci­ples that you belie­ve one should take into account when film­ing histo­ry or put­ting histo­ry on film?

No, of cour­se not, ever­yo­ne can do this in his or her own way. The beau­ty of films is that the­re are no rules, apart from the ones impo­sed by others or self-impo­sed. As for me, I belie­ve that this illu­sio­nist recon­s­truc­tion of the past is not only impos­si­ble, but also ques­tionable (after all, why would you want to give the view­ers the illu­si­on that “this is exact­ly how things were 200 years ago”), so I tried to at least find ways of repre­sen­ting the past in a man­ner that also shows the limits of this representation.

Do you feel that Romania’s tre­at­ment of its pro­ble­ma­tic past(s) has chan­ged in recent times, and if so, in what way?

I think some pro­gress has been made, but it is very fra­gi­le. For ins­tance, when I was in high school at the begin­ning of the 90’s, nobo­dy men­tio­ned the Roma­ni­an par­ti­ci­pa­ti­on in the mass mur­ders of WW2, but the­re is some infor­ma­ti­on on this now. On the other hand, in the last few years one can noti­ce a revi­val of natio­na­lism, put to use in many dif­fe­rent ways. For ins­tance, we just had a shameful refe­ren­dum orga­ni­zed by the sta­te hand in hand with the Roma­ni­an Ortho­dox Church. The refe­ren­dum was about “the defi­ni­ti­on of the fami­ly,” but in fact it was just a hate refe­ren­dum to pre­vent the pos­si­bi­li­ty of equal rights for LGBTQ peo­p­le. But not only that, the who­le cam­paign in favour of that stu­pid refe­ren­dum was fil­led with natio­na­lism and con­ser­va­tism in its most dubio­us forms (“let’s get back to our old Chris­ti­an tra­di­ti­ons,” “let’s not accept the fake values of Euro­pe,” etc.) and all that in a frigh­tening quan­ti­ty. The fact that many peo­p­le boy­cot­ted the refe­ren­dum, which in the end was not suc­cessful, shows there’s some hope left.

When did you first beco­me stron­gly awa­re of the ext­ent of Romania’s his­to­ri­cal antisemitism?

It was also while I was in high school, but not becau­se of the school, but becau­se of some books that appeared at that time. The­re was also a short docu­men­ta­ry film, which now seems to be lost, so at least I can men­ti­on its name: The Last Jew by Flo­rin Iepan. I still remem­ber how impres­sed I was when I saw this film on TV.

You have noted in an inter­view that you don’t belie­ve in the say­ing that histo­ry repeats its­elf. What do you mean by that?

I was refer­ring to an idea that beca­me some kind of a thin­king cli­ché, the idea that “histo­ry repeats its­elf.” Becau­se I think the­re are forms of thin­king and beha­viour that crea­te simi­lar events, but they also have dif­fe­rent forms. I don’t think the Holo­caust will hap­pen again, but the­re are other hor­ri­ble things, it is enough to see one image from Yemen to under­stand it is hap­pe­ning all the time.

Your films in some way escape typi­cal “auteu­rist“ attri­bu­tes. Here you employ inter­tit­les, the­re you make a docu­men­ta­ry with pho­to­graphs, then you have male and fema­le leads, film­ing in black and white as well as in colour, dif­fe­rent aspect rati­os, films about move­ment, films about being unable to move and so on. May­be this is a sil­ly ques­ti­on to ask, but how do you find the form for your films? How do you keep free from what alre­a­dy work­ed before?

Oh, this is (actual­ly, was) one of my big frus­tra­ti­ons, that I am not an auteur. I mean, I got over it, but I am still nost­al­gic for a per­so­nal style, a per­so­nal visi­on. I know I will never have it, I got used to this idea. I just make the films in a man­ner which I dis­co­ver for each pro­ject at a time. That’s all.

Is it hard to get money for your films?

Well, my films are not very expen­si­ve and it was a litt­le bit easier for my last pro­ject, but it is still very com­pli­ca­ted. It helps that today one can make films wit­hout so much money. As Godard used to say, if I have only one dol­lar, I will make a one-dol­lar film.